nature or architecture …?!
this seems to be a simple or silly question .. or rather not …? doctor erosion & assistant stupid did best jobs allover our planet´s stonewonders for sure ..!? .. maybe the riddle is just to be solved by answering if the stones show signs of quarrying or casting, beeing created fresh or deeply deposited ….? .. where inside the circle of processing do they show signs of flowing or hefting while being molded …?
many socalled historic sites are results of more or less obviously built objects, .. in contrast other sites are judged to be freaky exhibits of nature, fancy products of geology in love with the famous wool sack weathering of granit & maya´s honeycomb erosion … aging in time should be as obvious as time itself .. decay as a symptom of existance, apart from eternal syncronically vibrating structures of energetic pulses or refreshing cycles …?
no argument that giza pyramids grew from the sand without plan of intelligent beings or stonehenge was created by tides & catastrophies, but if we turn our heads towards remarkable landmarks as the three wales rocks (thailand), samaipatra (bolivia) and barabar hills (india), the perspective of actual studies or visitors drifts from the admiration of the megalithic rocks to the caves & to the degradation as quarries, … so there is a wide spectrum of priority examination due to the eyes & noses of the spectators …?! the three wales rocks offer machinecuts & caves, so do the submarine-like-shaped rocks at barabar & the embankment of hard cowdung at samaipatra …, so let us focus on the combination of enourmous poured megastones in obviously unnatural shape, the extraction of parts of material in uncredibly precision cuts & polishs & the tendency to shape symmetric forms in positive direction outside or negative construction methods in the inside of those materials … and remember that the muppets´show was played by puppets & pigs in space may have fallen from the sky & landed as huge granit heaps, so these stonebreads were just waiting for the tools & fools to be shaped into temples, mausoleums or even cattle sheds ..?! .. the globally spread ultra-hard boxes of granit or other hard stones in caves & mine tunnels seems to have their negative forms shaped in rocks & strange lumbs & unestimably weird-shaped megaliths … & many of those seem to be created as perfectly exact as possible, while some are more or less stumperless in elaboration & only show the idea of what might have been aimed …?
we need to follow our instincts in several parallel ways, not neglecting major aspects in the moment that we find along with what is luring to tie our senses ..
precision work on hardest stones using the metric system is found in many places like the pyramids of giza, the H-blocks of puma punku tiahuanaco or at gobleki tepe or yonaguni monument, shaping methods like scorchmarks are found at the unfinished obelisk of aswan as well as in the dolmens de soto (andalucia), the externstones (germany), the balbek-monuments and the walls of sacsayhuaman (peru) .. if we consider these similarities we need to look for the whole, not only spot on the parts, and see the preparing job of creating the huge amounts of material in multiple shapes first, then cut or model forms for functions that we cant really imagine, as we are a limited edition of beeings compared to those who built the sceneries. let´s forget the fairytale that those objects were constructed for burial rites or corpse placements … rites & sacrifices, canonizations & bloody rituals assumingly just took place due to the inadequacies of groups lead by drugfogged seducers …?!?
google´s ai-assist resumes that megalith-sites are setup by “large, often unhewn stones” …, so even if considering “manmade” construction, the rocks are modulated by chiseling or primitive kinds of work using no technology but hand & hammer & metal … any hint of advanced modification skills is missing … find more on this topics on the parallel thoughts about our “insinuated methods” of creation …
even more strikingly blatant .. megaliths are devalued as beeing “prehistoric” . belonging to a faraway-time, not taking part in actual life & be entrance to wider capabilities & unquestionable competence ..
we can see researchers walking the crater´s rim & being so convinced to trust in volcanos as remnants of nature´s chaotic whim & tectonic movements on the earths´layers, but what about guessing that these locations & zones, lines & rifts are well arranged or gladly used by higher knowledge, as we find many hotspots of socalled ancient sites positioned near the magnetic equator & clever calculated intersections & geometric patterns ..?! active mountainsites maybe used as gates or portals, .. & pyramids maybe situated as the tips of obelisk-like underconstructions drilled & built into the bedrock to serve as great connectors or infrastructural gateways between the worlds that are undersurface & faraway in space for our limited dimensional understanding of the structure of our environment ..? there are so many places to be studied, considering energetic peculiarities & geological conspicuousnesses are chances to unveil secrets of our basic environment ..!
.. this site is in composition & far under construction ..
